Analysis of Women’s Involvement in Household Decision Making

The bar graph above displays the responses to the question “Are women involved in the household decision making process?” within the dataset. Here is the distribution:

  • Yes: 663 responses
  • No: 390 responses


1. Overall Involvement:

  • A significant majority, approximately 63%, of the responses indicate that women are involved in household decision-making processes. This suggests a positive trend towards gender inclusivity in domestic spheres within the surveyed communities.
Output image

This graph concisely illustrates the specific challenges that restrict the participation of women and girls in decision-making processes. Each bar represents the frequency of responses that identified a particular challenge as a barrier:

  • Males are Dominant (758 responses): This is the predominant challenge, indicating that male-centric decision-making norms significantly hinder female involvement.
  • Religious Practices or Beliefs (381 responses): These issues point to traditional and conservative views held within communities that may limit women’s roles based on religious interpretations.
  • Socio-Economic Factors (363 responses): Economic disparities and social class differences often marginalize women, restricting their ability to participate equally in household and societal decisions.
  • Political Context (75 responses): Though less cited, the political landscape can also be a significant barrier, possibly due to inadequate representation or policies that do not favor gender inclusivity.

This visualization and analysis highlight the need for targeted interventions that address these specific barriers, promoting a more inclusive and equitable environment for women and girls in decision-making roles. ​​

Output image

The pie chart above displays the proportion of responses to whether communities have disaster reduction mechanisms in place specifically to ensure the well-being of women and girls. Here’s the distribution:

  • No (61.4%): A majority, totaling 644 responses, indicate that there are no specific disaster reduction mechanisms in place for women and girls, suggesting a significant gap in community preparedness and gender-specific safety planning.
  • Yes (38.6%): Conversely, 401 responses affirm the presence of such mechanisms, highlighting some level of community initiative towards addressing the specific needs of women and girls in disaster scenarios.

The data reveals a concerning lack of targeted disaster reduction mechanisms for women and girls, which are crucial not only for general community safety but also for ensuring that the unique needs of these groups are addressed during crises. This lack of preparedness could exacerbate vulnerabilities during disasters, particularly for women and girls, who often face heightened risks of gender-based violence, health issues, and economic hardship in such times. Communities need to integrate gender-specific strategies in their disaster preparedness plans to enhance resilience and safety for all members, reflecting a comprehensive approach to disaster risk reduction. This visualization and the data it represents could be pivotal for NGOs, policymakers, and community leaders in advocating for and implementing more inclusive disaster management and response strategies.

Output image

The word cloud visualizes the variety of suggestions made by the respondents on mechanisms to implement for overcoming anticipated disasters, particularly with a focus on ensuring the well-being of women and girls. The size of each word in the cloud indicates its frequency among the responses, with larger words being suggested more often.

Key Suggestions Highlighted:

  • Education and Awareness: Frequent mentions of ‘training’, ‘workshops’, ‘awareness’, and ‘education’ suggest a strong belief in the power of knowledge dissemination as a foundational mechanism.
  • Infrastructure: Words like ‘shelters’, ‘safe’, ‘houses’, and ‘construction’ point to a need for robust infrastructure that can withstand disasters and provide safety.
  • Health Services: The prominence of ‘health’, ‘services’, and ‘medical’ underscores the necessity of accessible healthcare before, during, and after disasters.
  • Community Involvement: Terms such as ‘community’, ‘support’, and ‘programs’ highlight the importance of community-driven responses and local involvement in planning and implementation.
  • Government and Policies: The significant appearance of ‘government’, ‘policies’, and ‘laws’ indicates a call for more stringent policies and active government involvement in disaster management.

The responses strongly advocate for comprehensive approaches combining education, infrastructure improvement, health services, community involvement, and robust government policies to effectively prepare for and respond to disasters. This holistic view emphasizes not only the practical aspects of disaster preparedness but also the social and political frameworks that support these efforts, particularly in safeguarding vulnerable groups like women and girls. The suggestions point towards a community-centric approach augmented by governmental support to enhance resilience against potential disasters. ​​

The bar chart above illustrates the responses to whether there is a need for capacity development for women and girls to enhance their social and political well-being. Here’s how the responses are distributed:

  • Yes: 593 responses
  • No: 460 responses

The results indicate a strong recognition of the need for capacity development among the respondents, with a significant majority (56%) affirming its necessity. This suggests that there is a general consensus on the importance of empowering women and girls through education, skills training, and other capacity-building initiatives that could enhance their roles in social and political domains.

Key Insights:

  1. Acknowledgment of Disparities: The predominance of ‘Yes’ responses reflects an acknowledgment of existing disparities in social and political opportunities for women and girls. It underscores the community’s recognition that targeted interventions are required to bridge these gaps.
  2. Diverse Needs and Solutions: The varied responses also hint at diverse perceptions regarding the effectiveness and needs of such programs. While more than half see the necessity, a significant minority do not perceive a current need, which could indicate differing views on gender roles or the effectiveness of existing initiatives.
  3. Implications for Stakeholders: For NGOs, governments, and other stakeholders, these findings highlight the critical demand for programs focused on enhancing the capabilities of women and girls. The data advocates for strategic planning in developmental policies to incorporate gender-specific capacity-building that can empower women and girls socio-politically.
  4. Future Directions: Moving forward, it is crucial for policy-makers and community planners to consider these insights and integrate comprehensive capacity-building programs that address the specific needs of women and girls. Ensuring their active participation in these initiatives could lead to more equitable social structures and more inclusive political processes.

The bar chart illustrates the responses to whether women and girls are involved in decision-making processes and political participation in Somalia. The distribution of responses is as follows:

  • No: 575 responses
  • Yes: 475 responses

The results demonstrate a nearly even split in perceptions regarding the involvement of women and girls in these crucial areas, with a slight majority (55%) indicating that they do not participate. This suggests a significant gap in gender inclusivity in Somalia’s social and political arenas.  The predominance of ‘No’ responses reflects a perceived exclusion of women and girls from decision-making and political spheres in Somalia. This indicates systemic barriers that prevent their full participation, which could include cultural norms, lack of legal rights, or insufficient representation in political structures.

Output image

The bar chart illustrates the reported instances of various gender-based violence (GBV) issues within the community, categorized into four major types. The data vividly depicts a community grappling with severe GBV issues that infringe on the rights and well-being of women and girls. The prominence of educational barriers and forced marriages suggests deeply entrenched societal norms and practices that discriminate against females. Sexual violence, including practices like FGM, further illustrates the critical human rights challenges facing the community.

Output imageThe bar chart above provides a visual representation of the various emotional and social problems reported by members of the community. The problems range widely from psychological issues like fear and anxiety to social conflicts within families and the wider community. 

The data reveals a community facing a complex array of emotional and social challenges that are deeply interwoven with the overall health, stability, and well-being of its members. The prevalence of fear, anger, and hopelessness particularly underscores the need for comprehensive community support systems, including mental health services, conflict resolution programs, and economic or social interventions to address the root causes of these issues. Community leaders, healthcare providers, and policymakers must consider these findings in their planning and initiatives to improve the community’s overall conditions.